Revonode

Connect every life science node to AI intelligence that powers your decisions

Discover the scientific risk behind any deal, mapped in hours, not weeks — every claim traced to its source, every gap surfaced before the investment committee.

Programs & affiliations

  • ETH Zürich Start-up
  • NVIDIA Inception
  • UPortunity
Who it's for

We support the licensing, M&A and investment decision makers in life science sector. The AI-powered diligence is disease area agnostic and can support evaluation of assets from public and private companies.

Biotech

01

Companies and founders evaluating assets, partners, and the competitive landscape around them.

Pharma

02

Business development and BD teams evaluating in-licensing, partnerships, and acquisitions.

Life science investors

03

VC, crossover, and growth funds running diligence on biotech deals at speed, with conviction.

Advisors & analysts

04

Deal advisors and analysts who run diligence for clients and need insights they can trust.

The solutions

Agentic AI that maps the scientific risk

Agents find every relevant source, bind each claim to it, and cross-check the full external record — then hand you the risk map behind the technology.

01

Ingest

The full data room — pitch decks, study reports, patents, CMC records, regulatory filings and market research — is ingested. Gap assessments and missing information are identified.

02

Index

Every assertion becomes a connected claim, bound to its exact source. Every diligence builds the proprietary knowledge graph.

03

Intelligence layer

Agents test each claim against the external record for gaps and risks. Real-world results bound to references are prioritized for trusted analysis.

output

Scientific risk map

A defensible view of the technology, delivered in the review platform — group review and evidence sharing inside the deal team.

The platform

A live report from your intelligence layer

A live slice of the workspace — ask a question, get a receipt.

Data room

Conditional

Source confidence

62

Uploaded files

Revonode report

Diligence chat

Does the Phase 2 data support the efficacy claim in the deck?

Revonode

Partly. The deck claims a 68% responder rate; the study report gives 68% for the 100 µg arm only, n=23, with no active comparator. The pooled figure across all arms is 54%. Two of the three cited supporting papers sit behind programmes that failed in humans — down-weighted, not hidden.

Illustrative dataset — the interface is live, the deal is invented.

What you gain

More capacity, and more confidence in every call

01 · Capacity

2% → the whole funnel

Today, 2% of what you screen reaches a deep review — each one costing a five-domain specialist team on the order of 50 hours. The rest are dropped for want of bandwidth, not merit.

  • not gated on specialist availability
  • the whole funnel, not the top of it
  • seven dimensions on every deal
02 · Confidence

Every claim bound

Every answer is traced to the page it came from — not to a plausible-sounding summary.

  • outcome-graded, not citation-ranked
  • gaps stated, never inferred
  • one standardized score across the funnel
The cost of a miss

One risk oversight can cost hundreds of millions

After months of diligence we licensed a rare-disease drug ready for phase III. The team missed one document, a competitor's orphan-drug designation, and lost market access to seven years of exclusivity.

Top-20 pharma director, global business development

Scientific validationTranslatability / CMCRegulatory filingsFreedom to operatePre-clinical evidenceTeam experienceClinical designExit potentialCompetitive analysis
FAQ

The things investors and partners ask us most.

Every claim binds to its exact source, and agents independently cross-check it against the external record across literature, clinical, regulatory, IP, and market. You can land on the sentence on the page in seconds, and if it can't show its receipt, it isn't asserted.

Gaps, the claims the deal's own evidence can't support, and risks: contradicting literature, failed or crowded trials, and competing patents. You see the landmines before the IC meeting, not after.

Your confidential and sensitive data is protected in our isolated data sets. Your data stays under your license so no co-investor, competing investor or analyst can access your information.

No. Company private reasoning layer is isolated by architecture. Only public knowledge is shared between reports while your confidential content and conclusions never leave your license.

You can start by contacting us for an introduction call or alternatively, bring us a deal you need assessed. We index the provided data, cross-check it against the external record, and provide you the diligence, and the gaps and risks, in hours.

Two things drive it: a license sized by how much deal material you keep indexed with us, and investigation tokens consumed by the deals you actually put through diligence. There are no seat counts and no per-document fees. Tell us your deal volume and we will quote it.

No. The interface is the real product, the deal is invented. Every company, figure and document in the walkthrough is fictional, because publishing a risk verdict about a real company would be neither fair nor accurate.

Bring us a deal.
See the diligence in hours.

Hand us a live or past data room. We'll index it, cross-check it against the external record, and show you the gaps and risks.